🇬🇧 Limited Time — UK Only·🎓 Free Learning for 1 Month·🤖 Free AI Training Included·📚 4,000+ Lessons · 35,000+ Quizzes·🏆 GCSE Mocks · Olympiad Papers·⚡ Selected Students Only · Limited Places·🎁 Free Value Worth £2,000·🇬🇧 Limited Time — UK Only·🎓 Free Learning for 1 Month·🤖 Free AI Training Included·📚 4,000+ Lessons · 35,000+ Quizzes·🏆 GCSE Mocks · Olympiad Papers·⚡ Selected Students Only · Limited Places·🎁 Free Value Worth £2,000·🇬🇧 Limited Time — UK Only·🎓 Free Learning for 1 Month·🤖 Free AI Training Included·📚 4,000+ Lessons · 35,000+ Quizzes·🏆 GCSE Mocks · Olympiad Papers·⚡ Selected Students Only · Limited Places·🎁 Free Value Worth £2,000·
All SQE mocks
SQE · Free Mock Test 215 of 250

Free SQE Mock Test 21520 Questions + Full Answers

Solicitors Qualifying Examination · Trainee solicitors · SQE1 sits: Jan & Jul

Sections: FLK1 · Applaa proprietary paper — free to download and print

No sign-up required · 100% free · Applaa proprietary content

Applaa SQE Mock Test 215

applaa-sqe-mock-215.pdf · 20 questions

Applaa proprietary content · Free to download and print · No sign-up required

Save PDF

Sample Questions — SQE Mock 215

8 of 20 shown

Correct answers highlighted in green. Full explanations included.

1
FLK1

A builder (Emma) contractually agreed to construct a wall for a customer (Quinn) for £5,000. Halfway through the job, the builder states they cannot finish unless the customer pays an extra £1,000. The customer agrees. After completion, the customer refuses to pay the extra £1,000. Under Williams v Roffey Bros, is the promise to pay the extra £1,000 binding?

  • A.No, because performing an existing contractual duty can never be good consideration.
  • B.Yes, if the customer obtained a practical benefit (such as avoiding a penalty clause to a third party) and there was no economic duress.
  • C.No, because a promise to pay more must be approved by the County Court under CPR regulations.
  • D.Yes, because oral contracts are automatically binding regardless of consideration.
  • E.No, because it violates Section 52 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Consideration and Practical Benefit (Williams v Roffey Bros) The traditional rule (Stilk v Myrick) held that performing an existing contractual duty cannot be good consideration. Williams v Roffey Bros [1990] modified this rule: performing an existing duty CAN be valid consideration if the promisee obtains a 'practical benefit'. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Traditional Rule: A builder promising to finish what they're already contractually bound to do provides nothing new - no consi

2
FLK1

A claimant (Jack) has applied for summary judgment against a defendant (Matthew) under CPR Part 24. What is the test that the court must apply to determine whether summary judgment should be granted?

  • A.The claimant must prove the case beyond all reasonable doubt.
  • B.The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at trial.
  • C.The value of the claim must be less than £10,000.
  • D.The defendant has failed to acknowledge service of the claim form within 14 days.
  • E.The dispute involves questions of international law.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Summary Judgment under CPR Part 24 Summary judgment allows a party to obtain judgment *without a full trial* where the opposing party's case has no real prospect of success. It is a cost-effective tool that avoids unnecessary litigation. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Who Can Apply: Either the claimant or defendant can apply for summary judgment under CPR Part 24.2. 2. The Test: The court will grant summary judgment if: - The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defendin

3
FLK1

A claimant (Caleb) has brought an action against a defendant (Kevin) in the County Court for breach of contract, claiming £150,000 in damages. The defendant has filed a defense. In accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), which track will this claim be allocated to?

  • A.Small Claims Track
  • B.Fast Track
  • C.Intermediate Track
  • D.Multi-Track
  • E.Commercial Court Track

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: CPR Track Allocation The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) allocate civil claims to one of four procedural tracks based primarily on *financial value* (and sometimes complexity). Each track has different procedural rules, costs caps, and hearing formats. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Identify the Claim Value: The claim is for £150,000. 2. Apply the Track Thresholds: - Small Claims Track: £10,000 (for most claims; £1,000 for personal injury/housing disrepair) - Fast Track: > £10

4
FLK1

Nathan offered to sell a piece of machinery to Beatrice for £20,000. Beatrice replied: 'I accept your offer, but I will pay £18,000.' Nathan did not respond. Two days later, Beatrice wrote to Nathan saying: 'I accept your original offer of £20,000.' Is there a binding contract between Nathan and Beatrice?

  • A.Yes, because the second letter constituted a valid acceptance of the original offer.
  • B.Yes, because the original offer remained open and had not been revoked by the offeror.
  • C.No, because the counter-offer of the lower price killed the original offer, meaning it could no longer be accepted.
  • D.No, because a contract for sale of goods must be made in writing signed by both parties.
  • E.Yes, because the offeror's silence on the counter-offer constituted acceptance of the lower price.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Counter-Offer and the Death of the Original Offer A counter-offer is a rejection of the original offer combined with a new offer on different terms. Once a counter-offer is made, the original offer is extinguished - it cannot be revived or accepted later. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Original Offer: Nathan offers the piece of machinery for £20,000. 2. Counter-Offer: Beatrice replies with £18,000 - this is a counter-offer, NOT an acceptance. Under Hyde v Wrench (1840), this kills th

5
FLK1

A shopkeeper (Wendy) places a designer coat in the shop window with a price tag of £120,000. A customer (Isabella) enters the shop, places the cash on the counter, and demands to buy the item. The shopkeeper refuses to sell it. Is there a binding contract?

  • A.Yes, because placing the item in the window was a unilateral offer that was accepted by the customer's cash payment.
  • B.No, because the display of goods in a shop window is an invitation to treat, not an offer. Refusing to sell does not breach any contract (Fisher v Bell).
  • C.Yes, because consumer protection laws force retailers to sell all displayed items automatically.
  • D.No, because contracts for sales in shops require a written signed document.
  • E.Yes, because the shopkeeper was silent when the customer entered, constituting acceptance.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Invitation to Treat vs. Offer A binding contract requires a valid *offer* and *acceptance*. The display of goods in a shop window or on a shelf is an invitation to treat - an invitation for customers to make offers. It is fundamentally different from a legal offer, which can be accepted to form a contract. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. What is an Invitation to Treat?: A display of goods with a price tag is not an offer - it is merely an expression of willingness to deal on those ter

6
FLK1

A claimant (Victor) makes a valid CPR Part 36 settlement offer to the defendant (Caleb) of £18,500. The defendant rejects the offer. The case goes to trial, and the claimant wins, obtaining judgment of £21,275. What is the primary costs consequence under Part 36?

  • A.The claimant must pay the defendant's costs on the indemnity basis.
  • B.The defendant must pay the claimant's costs on the indemnity basis, plus interest on those costs, from the expiry of the relevant offer period.
  • C.The court will split the trial costs equally between both parties.
  • D.All costs recovery is capped at the Small Claims Track limit.
  • E.The defendant is immune to costs penalties because they defended the claim in good faith.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: CPR Part 36 Offers and Cost Consequences A Part 36 offer is a formal settlement mechanism under CPR. When a claimant's Part 36 offer is beaten at trial (i.e., judgment exceeds the offer), the defendant faces automatic cost penalties designed to encourage early settlement. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Victor's Offer: £18,500 - a valid Part 36 offer. 2. Caleb's Decision: Rejected the offer and proceeded to trial. 3. Trial Outcome: Victor wins £21,275 - which *exceeds* the Part 36 off

7
FLK1

A builder (Julia) contractually agreed to construct a wall for a customer (Lucas) for £5,000. Halfway through the job, the builder states they cannot finish unless the customer pays an extra £1,000. The customer agrees. After completion, the customer refuses to pay the extra £1,000. Under Williams v Roffey Bros, is the promise to pay the extra £1,000 binding?

  • A.No, because performing an existing contractual duty can never be good consideration.
  • B.Yes, if the customer obtained a practical benefit (such as avoiding a penalty clause to a third party) and there was no economic duress.
  • C.No, because a promise to pay more must be approved by the County Court under CPR regulations.
  • D.Yes, because oral contracts are automatically binding regardless of consideration.
  • E.No, because it violates Section 52 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Consideration and Practical Benefit (Williams v Roffey Bros) The traditional rule (Stilk v Myrick) held that performing an existing contractual duty cannot be good consideration. Williams v Roffey Bros [1990] modified this rule: performing an existing duty CAN be valid consideration if the promisee obtains a 'practical benefit'. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Traditional Rule: A builder promising to finish what they're already contractually bound to do provides nothing new - no consi

8
FLK1

A seller (Harry) negligently makes a false statement of fact regarding the turnover of a business to a buyer (Oliver), inducing them to buy it. The buyer subsequently discovers the fraud. Which of the following describes the remedies available under the Misrepresentation Act 1967?

  • A.The contract is automatically void, and the seller must be prosecuted criminally.
  • B.Rescission of the contract and/or damages under Section 2(1) of the Act.
  • C.The buyer can only recover damages and has no right to rescind the contract under any circumstances.
  • D.The contract is binding, and no remedy is available since the buyer should have checked the accounts (caveat emptor).
  • E.The seller is required to perform specific performance of the turnover projection.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Misrepresentation Act 1967 - Remedies The Misrepresentation Act 1967 classifies misrepresentation into three types (fraudulent, negligent, innocent) and provides different remedies for each. A negligent misrepresentation under Section 2(1) is the most commonly tested in SQE. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Identify the Type: A *negligent* false statement of fact made by Harry to induce Oliver to buy. 2. Remedy Under Section 2(1): The innocent party (Oliver) may: - Rescind the contr

Download the PDF for all 20 questions + full mark scheme

Download PDF

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this SQE mock exam free?+

Yes. All 250 Applaa SQE mock exams are completely free — no registration, no paywall. Download PDF or view in browser.

What is FLK1 in the SQE exam?+

FLK1 (Functioning Legal Knowledge 1) is the first part of the SQE1 assessment, testing substantive and procedural law across multiple legal practice areas with multiple-choice questions. Each Applaa SQE mock covers FLK1-style questions with full explanations.

How many SQE practice questions are in each mock?+

Each Applaa SQE mock test contains 20 functioning legal knowledge questions with worked explanations, mirroring the question style of the real SQE1 assessment.

Are these SQE mock papers relevant for 2025?+

Yes. Applaa's SQE mock papers are updated for the current SQE1 syllabus and are suitable for candidates sitting SQE1 in 2025 and 2026.

Download This Mock

Free PDF — 20 questions with worked answers. Print it or attempt offline.

Download PDF Free

No sign-up · No paywall · Applaa proprietary

Paper Info

Exam
SQE
Mock number
215 of 250
Questions
20
Format
Multiple Choice (MCQ)
Sections
1
Audience
Trainee solicitors
Timing
SQE1 sits: Jan & Jul
Copyright
Applaa Proprietary

Sections Covered

  • FLK1

AI step-by-step guidance

Appy Buddy in the Applaa desktop app guides you through every question with Socratic AI tutoring — explains why each answer is right or wrong.

Download Applaa Free