Yes, Applaa is completely free to download and use. There are no subscriptions, no in-app purchases, and no hidden fees. A Pro plan is available for users who want additional AI credits.

What age is Applaa for?

Applaa is designed for kids and young adults aged 7 to 20. The platform scales from beginner drag-and-drop coding to advanced Python, JavaScript, React, and AI/ML.

Is Applaa safe for children?

Yes. Applaa is fully COPPA compliant, shows no advertisements of any kind, uses AI content moderation on all generated content, and provides a parent visibility dashboard so parents can monitor their child's activity.

What can kids build with Applaa?

Kids can build web apps, mobile apps, games, and digital tools using AI assistance. They describe their idea in plain English and Applaa's AI builds working code instantly. Creations can be published to the Applaa Marketplace where kids can earn real money.

What coding languages does Applaa teach?

Applaa's Academy covers Python, JavaScript, React, TypeScript, HTML/CSS, and AI/ML concepts across 130+ free lessons and 150+ challenges.

Does Applaa work on Windows and Mac?

Yes. Applaa is available as a free desktop app for both Windows and macOS. No sign-up is required to get started.

All SQE mocks

Mock 129 Mock 131

SQE · Free Mock Test 130 of 250

Free SQE Mock Test 130 — 20 Questions + Full Answers

Solicitors Qualifying Examination · Trainee solicitors · SQE1 sits: Jan & Jul

Sections: FLK1 · Applaa proprietary paper — free to download and print

Download PDF Free Open in New Tab Attempt with AI Tutoring

No sign-up required · 100% free · Applaa proprietary content

Applaa SQE Mock Test 130

applaa-sqe-mock-130.pdf · 20 questions

Full screen Download

Applaa proprietary content · Free to download and print · No sign-up required

Save PDF

Sample Questions — SQE Mock 130

8 of 20 shown

Correct answers highlighted in green. Full explanations included.

FLK1

A claimant (Thomas) has brought an action against a defendant (Mila) in the County Court for breach of contract, claiming £220,000 in damages. The defendant has filed a defense. In accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), which track will this claim be allocated to?

A.Small Claims Track
B.Fast Track
C.Intermediate Track
D.Multi-Track
E.Commercial Court Track

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: CPR Track Allocation The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) allocate civil claims to one of four procedural tracks based primarily on *financial value* (and sometimes complexity). Each track has different procedural rules, costs caps, and hearing formats. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Identify the Claim Value: The claim is for £220,000. 2. Apply the Track Thresholds: - Small Claims Track: £10,000 (for most claims; £1,000 for personal injury/housing disrepair) - Fast Track: > £10

FLK1

A driver (Kate) crashes into a pedestrian (Jack) who is crossing the street, causing physical injuries. To establish negligence, the claimant must show that the defendant owed them a duty of care. How does the court establish if a duty of care exists for physical damage caused by positive actions?

A.By applying the three-stage Caparo test including fair, just, and reasonable criteria in every case.
B.By finding that the case falls within an established duty category (such as road users to other road users) where a duty is automatically owed (Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire).
C.By checking if the defendant signed a voluntary duty registration form.
D.By proving the defendant intended to cause physical harm.
E.By allocating the claim to the Fast Track under CPR guidelines.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Duty of Care - Established Categories (Robinson v Chief Constable) Not every case requires a full Caparo analysis. The Supreme Court in Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] confirmed that where a case falls into an *established duty category*, the duty is owed as a matter of precedent. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Is this an Established Category?: A driver ('Kate') causing physical injury to a pedestrian (Jack) through a positive act clearly falls within an es

FLK1

A claimant (Sophia) has applied for summary judgment against a defendant (Kevin) under CPR Part 24. What is the test that the court must apply to determine whether summary judgment should be granted?

A.The claimant must prove the case beyond all reasonable doubt.
B.The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at trial.
C.The value of the claim must be less than £10,000.
D.The defendant has failed to acknowledge service of the claim form within 14 days.
E.The dispute involves questions of international law.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Summary Judgment under CPR Part 24 Summary judgment allows a party to obtain judgment *without a full trial* where the opposing party's case has no real prospect of success. It is a cost-effective tool that avoids unnecessary litigation. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Who Can Apply: Either the claimant or defendant can apply for summary judgment under CPR Part 24.2. 2. The Test: The court will grant summary judgment if: - The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defendin

FLK1

A claimant (Victor) has applied for summary judgment against a defendant (Oliver) under CPR Part 24. What is the test that the court must apply to determine whether summary judgment should be granted?

A.The claimant must prove the case beyond all reasonable doubt.
B.The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at trial.
C.The value of the claim must be less than £10,000.
D.The defendant has failed to acknowledge service of the claim form within 14 days.
E.The dispute involves questions of international law.

✓ Worked Explanation

FLK1

A claimant (Victoria) has applied for summary judgment against a defendant (Alice) under CPR Part 24. What is the test that the court must apply to determine whether summary judgment should be granted?

A.The claimant must prove the case beyond all reasonable doubt.
B.The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at trial.
C.The value of the claim must be less than £10,000.
D.The defendant has failed to acknowledge service of the claim form within 14 days.
E.The dispute involves questions of international law.

✓ Worked Explanation

FLK1

Prior to the formal incorporation of Epsilon Foods plc, a promoter (Victor) signed a contract 'on behalf of the company' to purchase machinery from a supplier. The company is now incorporated. Which of the following best describes the liability of Victor and the company on this pre-incorporation contract?

A.The company is automatically bound by the contract upon incorporation, and the promoter is released.
B.The contract is completely void and unenforceable by any party.
C.The promoter is personally liable and entitled under the contract, subject to any agreement to the contrary, under Section 51 of the Companies Act 2006.
D.The company and the promoter are jointly and severally liable automatically.
E.The company can unilaterally ratify the contract without the supplier's agreement.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Pre-Incorporation Contracts (Section 51 CA 2006) A company cannot be a party to a contract before it legally exists. When a promoter signs a contract 'on behalf of' an unformed company, Section 51 CA 2006 provides the default rule: the promoter is personally bound. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Legal Status Before Incorporation: Epsilon Foods plc had no legal existence when Victor signed the contract. There was no legal entity to be bound. 2. Apply Section 51: The contract takes eff

FLK1

Prior to the formal incorporation of Meridian Group Ltd, a promoter (Victoria) signed a contract 'on behalf of the company' to purchase machinery from a supplier. The company is now incorporated. Which of the following best describes the liability of Victoria and the company on this pre-incorporation contract?

A.The company is automatically bound by the contract upon incorporation, and the promoter is released.
B.The contract is completely void and unenforceable by any party.
C.The promoter is personally liable and entitled under the contract, subject to any agreement to the contrary, under Section 51 of the Companies Act 2006.
D.The company and the promoter are jointly and severally liable automatically.
E.The company can unilaterally ratify the contract without the supplier's agreement.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Pre-Incorporation Contracts (Section 51 CA 2006) A company cannot be a party to a contract before it legally exists. When a promoter signs a contract 'on behalf of' an unformed company, Section 51 CA 2006 provides the default rule: the promoter is personally bound. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Legal Status Before Incorporation: Meridian Group Ltd had no legal existence when Victoria signed the contract. There was no legal entity to be bound. 2. Apply Section 51: The contract takes

FLK1

A shopkeeper (David) places a designer coat in the shop window with a price tag of £12,000. A customer (Zoe) enters the shop, places the cash on the counter, and demands to buy the item. The shopkeeper refuses to sell it. Is there a binding contract?

A.Yes, because placing the item in the window was a unilateral offer that was accepted by the customer's cash payment.
B.No, because the display of goods in a shop window is an invitation to treat, not an offer. Refusing to sell does not breach any contract (Fisher v Bell).
C.Yes, because consumer protection laws force retailers to sell all displayed items automatically.
D.No, because contracts for sales in shops require a written signed document.
E.Yes, because the shopkeeper was silent when the customer entered, constituting acceptance.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Invitation to Treat vs. Offer A binding contract requires a valid *offer* and *acceptance*. The display of goods in a shop window or on a shelf is an invitation to treat - an invitation for customers to make offers. It is fundamentally different from a legal offer, which can be accepted to form a contract. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. What is an Invitation to Treat?: A display of goods with a price tag is not an offer - it is merely an expression of willingness to deal on those ter

Download the PDF for all 20 questions + full mark scheme

Download PDF

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this SQE mock exam free?+

Yes. All 250 Applaa SQE mock exams are completely free — no registration, no paywall. Download PDF or view in browser.

What is FLK1 in the SQE exam?+

FLK1 (Functioning Legal Knowledge 1) is the first part of the SQE1 assessment, testing substantive and procedural law across multiple legal practice areas with multiple-choice questions. Each Applaa SQE mock covers FLK1-style questions with full explanations.

How many SQE practice questions are in each mock?+

Each Applaa SQE mock test contains 20 functioning legal knowledge questions with worked explanations, mirroring the question style of the real SQE1 assessment.

Are these SQE mock papers relevant for 2025?+

Yes. Applaa's SQE mock papers are updated for the current SQE1 syllabus and are suitable for candidates sitting SQE1 in 2025 and 2026.