Yes, Applaa is completely free to download and use. There are no subscriptions, no in-app purchases, and no hidden fees. A Pro plan is available for users who want additional AI credits.

What age is Applaa for?

Applaa is designed for kids and young adults aged 7 to 20. The platform scales from beginner drag-and-drop coding to advanced Python, JavaScript, React, and AI/ML.

Is Applaa safe for children?

Yes. Applaa is fully COPPA compliant, shows no advertisements of any kind, uses AI content moderation on all generated content, and provides a parent visibility dashboard so parents can monitor their child's activity.

What can kids build with Applaa?

Kids can build web apps, mobile apps, games, and digital tools using AI assistance. They describe their idea in plain English and Applaa's AI builds working code instantly. Creations can be published to the Applaa Marketplace where kids can earn real money.

What coding languages does Applaa teach?

Applaa's Academy covers Python, JavaScript, React, TypeScript, HTML/CSS, and AI/ML concepts across 130+ free lessons and 150+ challenges.

Does Applaa work on Windows and Mac?

Yes. Applaa is available as a free desktop app for both Windows and macOS. No sign-up is required to get started.

All SQE mocks

Mock 111 Mock 113

SQE · Free Mock Test 112 of 250

Free SQE Mock Test 112 — 20 Questions + Full Answers

Solicitors Qualifying Examination · Trainee solicitors · SQE1 sits: Jan & Jul

Sections: FLK1 · Applaa proprietary paper — free to download and print

Download PDF Free Open in New Tab Attempt with AI Tutoring

No sign-up required · 100% free · Applaa proprietary content

Applaa SQE Mock Test 112

applaa-sqe-mock-112.pdf · 20 questions

Full screen Download

Applaa proprietary content · Free to download and print · No sign-up required

Save PDF

Sample Questions — SQE Mock 112

8 of 20 shown

Correct answers highlighted in green. Full explanations included.

FLK1

A shopkeeper (Benjamin) places a laptop in the shop window with a price tag of £500,000. A customer (Philip) enters the shop, places the cash on the counter, and demands to buy the item. The shopkeeper refuses to sell it. Is there a binding contract?

A.Yes, because placing the item in the window was a unilateral offer that was accepted by the customer's cash payment.
B.No, because the display of goods in a shop window is an invitation to treat, not an offer. Refusing to sell does not breach any contract (Fisher v Bell).
C.Yes, because consumer protection laws force retailers to sell all displayed items automatically.
D.No, because contracts for sales in shops require a written signed document.
E.Yes, because the shopkeeper was silent when the customer entered, constituting acceptance.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Invitation to Treat vs. Offer A binding contract requires a valid *offer* and *acceptance*. The display of goods in a shop window or on a shelf is an invitation to treat - an invitation for customers to make offers. It is fundamentally different from a legal offer, which can be accepted to form a contract. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. What is an Invitation to Treat?: A display of goods with a price tag is not an offer - it is merely an expression of willingness to deal on those ter

FLK1

A shopkeeper (Ryan) places a designer coat in the shop window with a price tag of £350,000. A customer (Liam) enters the shop, places the cash on the counter, and demands to buy the item. The shopkeeper refuses to sell it. Is there a binding contract?

A.Yes, because placing the item in the window was a unilateral offer that was accepted by the customer's cash payment.
B.No, because the display of goods in a shop window is an invitation to treat, not an offer. Refusing to sell does not breach any contract (Fisher v Bell).
C.Yes, because consumer protection laws force retailers to sell all displayed items automatically.
D.No, because contracts for sales in shops require a written signed document.
E.Yes, because the shopkeeper was silent when the customer entered, constituting acceptance.

✓ Worked Explanation

FLK1

A seller (Kevin) negligently makes a false statement of fact regarding the turnover of a business to a buyer (Ian), inducing them to buy it. The buyer subsequently discovers the fraud. Which of the following describes the remedies available under the Misrepresentation Act 1967?

A.The contract is automatically void, and the seller must be prosecuted criminally.
B.Rescission of the contract and/or damages under Section 2(1) of the Act.
C.The buyer can only recover damages and has no right to rescind the contract under any circumstances.
D.The contract is binding, and no remedy is available since the buyer should have checked the accounts (caveat emptor).
E.The seller is required to perform specific performance of the turnover projection.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Misrepresentation Act 1967 - Remedies The Misrepresentation Act 1967 classifies misrepresentation into three types (fraudulent, negligent, innocent) and provides different remedies for each. A negligent misrepresentation under Section 2(1) is the most commonly tested in SQE. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Identify the Type: A *negligent* false statement of fact made by Kevin to induce Ian to buy. 2. Remedy Under Section 2(1): The innocent party (Ian) may: - Rescind the contract (r

FLK1

A director of Summit Logistics Ltd (a private company limited by shares) wants to allot new shares to a new investor (Helen) to raise capital of £95,000. The company has only one class of ordinary shares. Under the Companies Act 2006, which of the following is correct regarding the director's authority to allot these shares?

A.The director has automatic statutory authority to allot the shares without shareholder approval under Section 550, unless restricted by the articles.
B.The director must always obtain authorization by ordinary resolution of the shareholders under Section 551.
C.The director must obtain authorization by special resolution of the shareholders to allot any shares.
D.The director requires the approval of the Board of Trade before alloting any class of shares.
E.Authority is only required if the allotment would cause the company to exceed its authorised share capital as stated in the memorandum.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Director's Authority to Allot Shares (Section 550 CA 2006) The Companies Act 2006 grants directors of private companies with a single class of shares a specific statutory power to allot shares of that class without requiring shareholder approval - unless the articles restrict this. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Identify Company Type: Summit Logistics Ltd is a *private* company limited by shares with *one* class of ordinary shares. 2. Apply Section 550: Directors of such a company ha

FLK1

A claimant (Daniel) has brought an action against a defendant (Jack) in the County Court for breach of contract, claiming £7,500 in damages. The defendant has filed a defense. In accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), which track will this claim be allocated to?

A.Small Claims Track
B.Fast Track
C.Intermediate Track
D.Multi-Track
E.Commercial Court Track

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: CPR Track Allocation The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) allocate civil claims to one of four procedural tracks based primarily on *financial value* (and sometimes complexity). Each track has different procedural rules, costs caps, and hearing formats. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Identify the Claim Value: The claim is for £7,500. 2. Apply the Track Thresholds: - Small Claims Track: £10,000 (for most claims; £1,000 for personal injury/housing disrepair) - Fast Track: > £10,0

FLK1

An employee of Zenith Retail Ltd negligently injures a customer (Georgia) while driving a company delivery van to make a scheduled delivery. The customer sues Zenith Retail Ltd. What is the legal doctrine that allows the employer to be held liable, and what is the test?

A.Res Ipsa Loquitur; requires showing the van was in a defective condition.
B.Vicarious liability; requires showing that the employee committed a tort in the course of their employment.
C.Strict liability; requires showing the employer acted with malicious intent.
D.Privity of liability; requires a signed agreement between the employer and the customer.
E.Contributory liability; requires allocating the claim to the Multi-Track.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Vicarious Liability Vicarious liability makes an employer strictly liable for torts committed by their employee, where the tort occurs in the 'course of employment'. It is a form of secondary liability - the employer is liable even without their own fault. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Identify the Employer-Employee Relationship: The delivery driver is an employee of Zenith Retail Ltd (not an independent contractor). 2. Course of Employment Test: Was the tort committed while perform

FLK1

A seller (Bob) negligently makes a false statement of fact regarding the turnover of a business to a buyer (Zoe), inducing them to buy it. The buyer subsequently discovers the fraud. Which of the following describes the remedies available under the Misrepresentation Act 1967?

A.The contract is automatically void, and the seller must be prosecuted criminally.
B.Rescission of the contract and/or damages under Section 2(1) of the Act.
C.The buyer can only recover damages and has no right to rescind the contract under any circumstances.
D.The contract is binding, and no remedy is available since the buyer should have checked the accounts (caveat emptor).
E.The seller is required to perform specific performance of the turnover projection.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Misrepresentation Act 1967 - Remedies The Misrepresentation Act 1967 classifies misrepresentation into three types (fraudulent, negligent, innocent) and provides different remedies for each. A negligent misrepresentation under Section 2(1) is the most commonly tested in SQE. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Identify the Type: A *negligent* false statement of fact made by Bob to induce Zoe to buy. 2. Remedy Under Section 2(1): The innocent party (Zoe) may: - Rescind the contract (ret

FLK1

A director of Nexus Media plc (a private company limited by shares) wants to allot new shares to a new investor (Mia) to raise capital of £120,000. The company has only one class of ordinary shares. Under the Companies Act 2006, which of the following is correct regarding the director's authority to allot these shares?

A.The director has automatic statutory authority to allot the shares without shareholder approval under Section 550, unless restricted by the articles.
B.The director must always obtain authorization by ordinary resolution of the shareholders under Section 551.
C.The director must obtain authorization by special resolution of the shareholders to allot any shares.
D.The director requires the approval of the Board of Trade before alloting any class of shares.
E.Authority is only required if the allotment would cause the company to exceed its authorised share capital as stated in the memorandum.

✓ Worked Explanation

Core Concept: Director's Authority to Allot Shares (Section 550 CA 2006) The Companies Act 2006 grants directors of private companies with a single class of shares a specific statutory power to allot shares of that class without requiring shareholder approval - unless the articles restrict this. Step-by-Step Resolution: 1. Identify Company Type: Nexus Media plc is a *private* company limited by shares with *one* class of ordinary shares. 2. Apply Section 550: Directors of such a company have po

Download the PDF for all 20 questions + full mark scheme

Download PDF

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this SQE mock exam free?+

Yes. All 250 Applaa SQE mock exams are completely free — no registration, no paywall. Download PDF or view in browser.

What is FLK1 in the SQE exam?+

FLK1 (Functioning Legal Knowledge 1) is the first part of the SQE1 assessment, testing substantive and procedural law across multiple legal practice areas with multiple-choice questions. Each Applaa SQE mock covers FLK1-style questions with full explanations.

How many SQE practice questions are in each mock?+

Each Applaa SQE mock test contains 20 functioning legal knowledge questions with worked explanations, mirroring the question style of the real SQE1 assessment.

Are these SQE mock papers relevant for 2025?+

Yes. Applaa's SQE mock papers are updated for the current SQE1 syllabus and are suitable for candidates sitting SQE1 in 2025 and 2026.